Merge pull request #3637 from weaveworks/issue-1962
resolve inconsistencies detected during ring merge
This commit is contained in:
3 files changed
+133
-24
No files matched your search
+5
-1
@@ -814,6 +814,10 @@ func (alloc *Allocator) sendRingUpdate(dest mesh.PeerName) {
|
||||
alloc.gossip.GossipUnicast(dest, msg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (alloc *Allocator) checkRangeHasAllocations(r address.Range) bool {
|
||||
return alloc.space.NumFreeAddressesInRange(r) != r.Size()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (alloc *Allocator) update(sender mesh.PeerName, msg []byte) error {
|
||||
reader := bytes.NewReader(msg)
|
||||
decoder := gob.NewDecoder(reader)
|
||||
@@ -832,7 +836,7 @@ func (alloc *Allocator) update(sender mesh.PeerName, msg []byte) error {
|
||||
// If someone sent us a ring, merge it into ours. Note this will move us
|
||||
// out of the awaiting-consensus state if we didn't have a ring already.
|
||||
case data.Ring != nil:
|
||||
updated, err := alloc.ring.Merge(*data.Ring)
|
||||
updated, err := alloc.ring.Merge(*data.Ring, alloc.checkRangeHasAllocations)
|
||||
switch err {
|
||||
case nil:
|
||||
if updated {
|
||||
|
||||
+54
-15
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ func (r *Ring) GrantRangeToHost(start, end address.Address, peer mesh.PeerName)
|
||||
|
||||
// Merge the given ring into this ring and indicate whether this ring
|
||||
// got updated as a result.
|
||||
func (r *Ring) Merge(gossip Ring) (bool, error) {
|
||||
func (r *Ring) Merge(gossip Ring, checkRangeHasAllocations func(r address.Range) bool) (bool, error) {
|
||||
r.assertInvariants()
|
||||
defer r.trackUpdates()()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -238,12 +238,22 @@ func (r *Ring) Merge(gossip Ring) (bool, error) {
|
||||
return false, ErrDifferentRange
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result, updated, err := r.Entries.merge(gossip.Entries, r.Peer)
|
||||
result, updated, err := r.Entries.merge(gossip.Entries, r.Peer, r, checkRangeHasAllocations)
|
||||
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// reset the free space for entries if there is invalid free space
|
||||
// due to accepting an unexpected update from the peers
|
||||
for i := 0; i < len(result); i++ {
|
||||
distance := r.distance(result.entry(i).Token, result.entry(i+1).Token)
|
||||
if result.entry(i).Peer == r.Peer && result.entry(i).Free > distance {
|
||||
// case that can arise when a range that we own that got split and had no allocations
|
||||
result.entry(i).Free = distance
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if err := r.checkEntries(result); err != nil {
|
||||
return false, fmt.Errorf("Merge of incoming data causes: %s", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -260,7 +270,7 @@ func (r *Ring) Merge(gossip Ring) (bool, error) {
|
||||
// entries belonging to ourPeer. Returns the merged entries and an
|
||||
// indication whether the merge resulted in any changes, i.e. the
|
||||
// result differs from the original.
|
||||
func (es entries) merge(other entries, ourPeer mesh.PeerName) (result entries, updated bool, err error) {
|
||||
func (es entries) merge(other entries, ourPeer mesh.PeerName, r *Ring, checkRangeHasAllocations func(r address.Range) bool) (result entries, updated bool, err error) {
|
||||
var mine, theirs *entry
|
||||
var previousOwner *mesh.PeerName
|
||||
addToResult := func(e entry) { result = append(result, &e) }
|
||||
@@ -274,6 +284,7 @@ func (es entries) merge(other entries, ourPeer mesh.PeerName) (result entries, u
|
||||
var i, j int
|
||||
for i < len(es) && j < len(other) {
|
||||
mine, theirs = es[i], other[j]
|
||||
common.Log.Debugln(fmt.Sprintf("[ring %s]: Merge mine.Token=%s theirs.Token=%s mine.Peer=%s theirs.Peer=%s mine.Version=%s theirs.Version=%s", ourPeer, mine.Token, theirs.Token, mine.Peer, theirs.Peer, fmt.Sprint(mine.Version), fmt.Sprint(theirs.Version)))
|
||||
switch {
|
||||
case mine.Token < theirs.Token:
|
||||
addToResult(*mine)
|
||||
@@ -282,29 +293,57 @@ func (es entries) merge(other entries, ourPeer mesh.PeerName) (result entries, u
|
||||
case mine.Token > theirs.Token:
|
||||
// insert, checking that a range owned by us hasn't been split
|
||||
if previousOwner != nil && *previousOwner == ourPeer && theirs.Peer != ourPeer {
|
||||
err = errEntryInMyRange(theirs)
|
||||
return
|
||||
// check we have no allocations in the range that got split
|
||||
if checkRangeHasAllocations(address.Range{Start: theirs.Token, End: mine.Token}) {
|
||||
err = errEntryInMyRange(theirs)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
addTheirs(*theirs)
|
||||
j++
|
||||
case mine.Token == theirs.Token:
|
||||
common.Log.Debugln(fmt.Sprintf("[ring %s]: Merge token=%s mine.Peer=%s theirs.Peer=%s mine.Version=%s theirs.Version=%s", ourPeer, mine.Token, mine.Peer, theirs.Peer, fmt.Sprint(mine.Version), fmt.Sprint(theirs.Version)))
|
||||
// merge
|
||||
switch {
|
||||
case mine.Version >= theirs.Version:
|
||||
if mine.Version == theirs.Version && !mine.Equal(theirs) {
|
||||
err = errInconsistentEntry(mine, theirs)
|
||||
return
|
||||
if mine.Peer == ourPeer {
|
||||
// if we own the entry and has allocations
|
||||
if checkRangeHasAllocations(address.Range{Start: mine.Token, End: es.entry(i + 1).Token}) {
|
||||
err = errInconsistentEntry(mine, theirs)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// tie-break here, pick the entry with the highest free count
|
||||
if mine.Free >= theirs.Free {
|
||||
addToResult(*mine)
|
||||
previousOwner = &mine.Peer
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
addTheirs(*theirs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
addToResult(*mine)
|
||||
previousOwner = &mine.Peer
|
||||
}
|
||||
addToResult(*mine)
|
||||
previousOwner = &mine.Peer
|
||||
common.Log.Debugln(fmt.Sprintf("[ring %s]: Merge token=%s mine.Peer=%s theirs.Peer=%s mine.Version=%s theirs.Version=%s", ourPeer, mine.Token, mine.Peer, theirs.Peer, fmt.Sprint(mine.Version), fmt.Sprint(theirs.Version)))
|
||||
case mine.Version < theirs.Version:
|
||||
if mine.Peer == ourPeer { // We shouldn't receive updates to our own tokens
|
||||
err = errNewerVersion(mine, theirs)
|
||||
return
|
||||
if mine.Peer == ourPeer {
|
||||
// We received update to our own tokens accept the received entry
|
||||
// if either it belongs to a different peer and we do not have allocations
|
||||
// in the range effectively given away, or it belongs to our own peer, in
|
||||
// which case we should set our version to the one received plus one,
|
||||
// effectively imposing our existing entry.
|
||||
if theirs.Peer != ourPeer && !checkRangeHasAllocations(address.Range{Start: mine.Token, End: es.entry(i + 1).Token}) {
|
||||
addTheirs(*theirs)
|
||||
} else if theirs.Peer == ourPeer {
|
||||
mine.Version = theirs.Version + 1
|
||||
addToResult(*mine)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
err = errNewerVersion(mine, theirs)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
addTheirs(*theirs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
addTheirs(*theirs)
|
||||
common.Log.Debugln(fmt.Sprintf("[ring %s]: Merge token=%s mine.Peer=%s theirs.Peer=%s mine.Version=%s theirs.Version=%s", ourPeer, mine.Token, mine.Peer, theirs.Peer, fmt.Sprint(mine.Version), fmt.Sprint(theirs.Version)))
|
||||
}
|
||||
i++
|
||||
j++
|
||||
|
||||
+74
-8
@@ -32,7 +32,25 @@ func ParseIP(s string) address.Address {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func merge(r1, r2 *Ring) error {
|
||||
_, err := r1.Merge(*r2)
|
||||
distance := func(start, end address.Address) address.Count {
|
||||
if end > start {
|
||||
return address.Count(end - start)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return address.Count((r1.End - start) + (end - r1.Start))
|
||||
}
|
||||
checkEntryHasAllocations := func(r address.Range) bool {
|
||||
size := distance(r.Start, r.End)
|
||||
entry, found := r1.Entries.get(r.Start)
|
||||
if !found {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
if entry.Free < size {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_, err := r1.Merge(*r2, checkEntryHasAllocations)
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -219,6 +237,61 @@ func TestMergeSimple(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
require.Equal(t, ring2.Entries, ring1.Entries)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestMergeWithConflicts(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
// received update to entry with a token and version identical to an entry we have
|
||||
// but but holding different content, if there are no allocations, resolve the
|
||||
// conflict by picking entry one with high free count
|
||||
ring1 := NewRing(start, end, peer1name)
|
||||
ring2 := NewRing(start, end, peer2name)
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Free: 256, Version: 1}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer2name, Free: 256, Version: 1}}
|
||||
require.NoError(t, merge(ring1, ring2))
|
||||
|
||||
// received update to entry with a token and version identical to an entry we have
|
||||
// but but holding different content, if there are allocations, then reject the received
|
||||
// entry
|
||||
ring1 = NewRing(start, end, peer1name)
|
||||
ring2 = NewRing(start, end, peer2name)
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Free: 128, Version: 1}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer2name, Free: 256, Version: 1}}
|
||||
require.Error(t, merge(ring1, ring2), "Expected error")
|
||||
|
||||
// received an entry with update to one of our own tokens and with new version,
|
||||
// accept the received entry if its still going to belong to us
|
||||
ring1 = NewRing(start, end, peer1name)
|
||||
ring2 = NewRing(start, end, peer2name)
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Version: 1}}
|
||||
require.NoError(t, merge(ring1, ring2))
|
||||
|
||||
// received an entry with update to one of our own tokens and with new version,
|
||||
// but belongs to a different peer, accept the received entry if we do not
|
||||
// have allocations in the range
|
||||
ring1 = NewRing(start, end, peer1name)
|
||||
ring2 = NewRing(start, end, peer2name)
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Free: 256}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer2name, Free: 256, Version: 1}}
|
||||
require.NoError(t, merge(ring1, ring2))
|
||||
|
||||
// received an entry with update to one of our own tokens and with new version,
|
||||
// reject received entry if we have allocations in the range
|
||||
ring1 = NewRing(start, end, peer1name)
|
||||
ring2 = NewRing(start, end, peer2name)
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Free: 128}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer2name, Version: 1}}
|
||||
require.Error(t, merge(ring1, ring2), "Expected error")
|
||||
|
||||
// we receive an entry that splits one of our ranges, giving some of it
|
||||
// away to another peer. accept the entry provided that we have no allocations
|
||||
// in the range that got given away.
|
||||
ring1 = NewRing(start, end, peer1name)
|
||||
ring2 = NewRing(start, end, peer2name)
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Free: 256, Version: 1}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Free: 128, Version: 2}, {Token: middle, Peer: peer2name, Free: 128}}
|
||||
require.NoError(t, merge(ring1, ring2))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestMergeErrors(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Cannot Merge in an invalid ring
|
||||
ring1 := NewRing(start, end, peer1name)
|
||||
@@ -231,13 +304,6 @@ func TestMergeErrors(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{}
|
||||
require.True(t, merge(ring1, ring2) == ErrDifferentRange, "Expected ErrDifferentRange")
|
||||
|
||||
// Cannot Merge newer version of entry I own
|
||||
ring2 = NewRing(start, end, peer2name)
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name, Version: 1}}
|
||||
fmt.Println(merge(ring1, ring2))
|
||||
require.Error(t, merge(ring1, ring2), "Expected error")
|
||||
|
||||
// Cannot Merge two entries with same version but different hosts
|
||||
ring1.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer1name}}
|
||||
ring2.Entries = []*entry{{Token: start, Peer: peer2name}}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user