Improve IPAM status wording

This commit is contained in:
Adam Harrison committed 2016-04-15 13:39:55 +01:00
1 parent 88e2761b18
commit b9340ada3e
2 files changed
+3 -3

No files matched your search

+1 -1
View File
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ var statusTemplate = defTemplate("status", `\
{{if .IPAM.Paxos.Elector}}\
Status: awaiting consensus (quorum: {{.IPAM.Paxos.Quorum}}, known: {{.IPAM.Paxos.KnownNodes}})
{{else}}\
Status: awaiting consensus (observer)
Status: priming
{{end}}\
{{else}}\
Status: idle
+2 -2
View File
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ the total allocation range and default subnet. Columns are as follows:
ongoing, triggered by an allocation or claim request;
allocations will block. This state persists until a quorum of
peers are able to communicate amongst themselves successfully.
The Status may also show '(observer)' instead of the quorum size,
if this peer has been started with the `--observer` option.
* 'priming' - peer is an observer and is waiting to receive IPAM
data from seeding or consensus elsewhere in the network
* 'ready' - consensus achieved; allocations proceed normally
* 'waiting for IP range grant from peers' - peer has exhausted its
agreed portion of the range and is waiting to be granted some