Improve IPAM status wording
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
88e2761b18
commit
b9340ada3e
2 files changed
+3
-3
No files matched your search
+1
-1
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ var statusTemplate = defTemplate("status", `\
|
||||
{{if .IPAM.Paxos.Elector}}\
|
||||
Status: awaiting consensus (quorum: {{.IPAM.Paxos.Quorum}}, known: {{.IPAM.Paxos.KnownNodes}})
|
||||
{{else}}\
|
||||
Status: awaiting consensus (observer)
|
||||
Status: priming
|
||||
{{end}}\
|
||||
{{else}}\
|
||||
Status: idle
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ the total allocation range and default subnet. Columns are as follows:
|
||||
ongoing, triggered by an allocation or claim request;
|
||||
allocations will block. This state persists until a quorum of
|
||||
peers are able to communicate amongst themselves successfully.
|
||||
The Status may also show '(observer)' instead of the quorum size,
|
||||
if this peer has been started with the `--observer` option.
|
||||
* 'priming' - peer is an observer and is waiting to receive IPAM
|
||||
data from seeding or consensus elsewhere in the network
|
||||
* 'ready' - consensus achieved; allocations proceed normally
|
||||
* 'waiting for IP range grant from peers' - peer has exhausted its
|
||||
agreed portion of the range and is waiting to be granted some
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user